Tuesday, March 20, 2007

When DO we see Billy Batson in the gimp suit?

One Diverse Comic Book Nation has a list of articles dealing with Power Girl and Mary Marvel.

Daughter of the SHORT STACK: The Smexy Edition

Yes, yes…it’s been 10,000 years since I was able to do a SHORT STACK, but with all the hullaballoo about Justice League of America #10 cover (aka the booblicious Power Girl cover) and the Countdown cover featuring Black Mary Marvel, I thought now was the time to introduce DAUGHTER OF THE SHORT STACK.



“when do we see Billy Batson [Captain Marvel - SHAZAM] in the gimp suit?”


When indeed.

Sunday, March 18, 2007

Ricky Gervais on Atheism


If you haven't had the pleasure of enjoying Ricky Gervais, of the BBC's The Office, HBO's Extras, and various other shows, and his humor about the bible and atheism, take some time sometime.


On RichardDawkins.net, they have links to a clip on atheism from Extras, and links to his jokes about how spot on the bible is. Listen as he explains where we came from.


Funny stuff from a funny guy.

Why pick on the comic industry?

Some ask, why people being so picky?

Why pick and prod at fantasy stories? Just let it be.

Well, an important reason is how women and girls are shown. Specifically the examples and heroes that are put forward for young girls to admire and imagine themselves as.

Why look to comics for this?

Seven Reasons Why The Comic Book Industry Needs To Create More Teen Role-Models

See? Time to get cracking.

Drawing women. No, draaawwing, with a pencil.


This story may be more a joke or myth, but it comes with a moral.

This is the cover for the upcoming issue of the comic book, Justice League of America.

Pictured is Black Canary, and Power Girl.

So much can be said. And I will point to some odd and irritating art habits and accepted rules in the comic industry, one of these days.

But you may...notice...Power Girl's (the one in white)...breast.

The story going around is that the original cover came in and the order came back that she needed a...reduction. This is the result. May be a joke. Still, look at her. She is supposed to be a serious 3 dimensional (No jokes...okay.) character and hero, a peer of Superman.

But if you look at many comics, and some real nasty work in the 90's, the need for reductions is not a rare. I have to link later to a great and actual art book put our by Marvel comics that really is a piece...

As for Power Girl, thank kryptonian physiology that she is a Kryptonian (Superman's species), or she would be in a hospital in traction.

She has a spine and back muscles of steel.

Seducing girls


To the right, Black Mary Marvel. Whos' that? Well in the DC (comic book) universe, you have the Marvel family. Captain Marvel -- SHAZAM, Captain Marvel Jr., and Mary Marvel.


Mary is one of the great Goody-Goodies of the DC Universe. Sweet, innocent, trusting, and moral. Not to mention a young girl, who takes the form of a young woman, to fight evil.


Coming up they are doing a new story, the Seduction of Innocence. It will deal with Mary.


I don't know what will be happening...but I am guessing she will be seduced by power, evil, or something.


The trouble I, and others, are having is with this:

But I fear it’s gonna be:

1) Mary dressing in super skimpy black outfits and her body suddenly being drawn to be super curvy and busty

2) Her becoming slutty and everything suddenly has to do with her wanting to smex things >.>;;

It seems like whenever a female hero goes to the darkside, those 2 things happen :\


That is the way it seems to always go. A female goes bad, or slips a little she has to wear (more) revealing clothes and act more promiscuous.

Why? If Superman goes dark, what happens? Does he hit on every women he meets? Does he wear a thong? Nope.

It says something about how we as a society approach the sexes, hmm?

Evil, women, sex. Interesting?

The OTHER life, your alter ego.

Here is an interesting series of videos.

They are an eclectic set of bits on secret id's, alter egos, twins (good and evil), altnerate realities, radically changing yourself, and so on.

Some of it is fun (The Justice League revealing their identies to each other.), some of it is odd, and some of it is classic (Superman vs. Clark Kent in Superman III.)

So, how's the novel going?


Here is a funny video, especially for all of us (and it always seems it is almost everyone) who are trying to write, or finish the novel.


It comes from animated comedy, Family Guy.



It puts to together the running gag of Stewie (Stewart Gilligan Griffin) mocking and taunting Brian (Brian Griffin) about the novel he is writing.

It is a fun few minutes from the show.

Enjoy.

More thoughts on health care.

At Time Goes By, their is a look at insurance and the lack there of.

One tragic story.

Due to poverty and Medicaid bungling, on 28 February, a 12-year-old boy died when an untreated dental problem led to a severe brain infection. An $80 tooth extraction could have prevented his death.

This is the sort of story that SHOULD NOT be occurring in this country in the 21st century. The fact it could happen in the 20th was a shame.

Health care. It is a matter of life and death. Duh!

But how do we handle it. Most all plans that are being touted, from Bush to Schwarzenegger to Edwards focus on private providers.


All [the various political schemes] retaining for-profit insurers which would effectively expand their customer base creating more profits and, presumably, even higher salaries for executives.


...the big carriers simply accumulate more power over healthcare providers and patients, using it to their own advantage...
So what is the alternative. Du...cough...obviously I'm leading to a universal government-run single-payer system.

Phil Mattera, at Alternet, looks at the issue of Private vs. Public. And interesting and good read.
The fact that basic dental support, is not more readily promoted, widely offered, or assured is pathetic. And, obviously, the same goes to the ears, nose, and throat issues. Kids, especially the kids, need that support. Beyond a few vaccinations, their are number of medical tests and treatments that will ensure the well being of the populace and the nation.

As anyone is health care can tell you, preemptive treatment and assistance saves a whole lot of money, and wear and tear.

Many years ago, I had a dentist with a mordant sense of humor who said, "Nobody ever died of teeth."€ Now we know differently. It will do everyone who has been wakened to the healthcare crisis good, as we follow the weeding out process of presidential contenders in the coming months, to keep in mind that 12-year-boy in Maryland who died needlessly of teeth.

Looking at inconvenient truths.


An Inconvenient Truth has been going around for awhile, as a film and as a presentation.



It has been praised by some and denounced by others.



Chris Mooney, at Intersections, has his own thoughts on the documentary and the science behind it.



He looks at the New York Times criticism of the film and numbers.


Let me be clear: I have seen An Inconvenient Truth, and I found it almost entirely accurate. Gore has done a tremendous job of drawing attention to this issue and he gets the science right by and large. But my question as a point of strategy has always been: Why include the 1 to 5 percent of more questionable stuff, and so leave onself open to this kind of attack? Given how incredibly smart and talented Al Gore is, didn't he see this coming?

Alas, I've already shown how Gore overstepped on the relationship between global warming and tornadic activity (something the Times piece curiously omits, as this is a clear cut-case and an obvious opportunity to show the IPCC itself contradicting Gore). The treatment of hurricanes in An Inconvenient Truth is also problematic...



This is something I have heard when other specialist comment on the film. It is mostly right on the nose. But it takes some worse cases when it isn't clear that they are what will happen. Or, like with the image of New York City partly underwater, the fact it will take up to 100 years to happen. A true result, but the omission makes the visuals extra scary.

These bared threads offer people who want to obfuscate the problems a way to do so.

Saturday, March 17, 2007

Evolution in print, under fire and misunderstood

Newsweek has a cover story on evolution this week.

I get a little leery when the media goes into evolution. It always feels like they miss the point. Though some studies have shown that the media is overwhelmingly positive about evolution, treating it as accepted fact.

Rosenhouse, at EvolutionBlog, has some good things to say about the article. So I do feel more optimistic and will have to pick it up tomorrow.

He does have some concerns though.

The science of human evolution is undergoing its own revolution. Although we tend to see the march of species down through time as a single-file parade, with descendant succeeding ancestor in a neat line, the emerging science shows that the story of our species is far more complicated than Biblical literalists would have it--but also more complex than secular science suspected.


Secular...science. Eh?

Also.
Sadly, one of the tropes of science coverage in mainstream media outlets is that everything has to be presented as a revolution.


This is a pain. When you treat the advancing of science as revolution, it is a short step to the science deniers tools. Science is so unstable. It is getting radically rewritten constantly. It is all guess work. And so on, and so forth.

One prime example of this, Scott Adams.

For him, Fossils are Bullshit.

PZ Meyer looks at the Newsweek article and Adams thoughts, and gives analysis. He explains all that Adams seems to not understand of science and the progress in evolutionary research.

It's clear what Adams' problems are. The bullshit detector he takes such pride in could function as a random number generator; he's got this weird idea that revising interpretations on the basis of better evidence implies that entire disciplines of science are false; he imagines that his knowledge of biology is state-of-the-art; and at the same time, he's abysmally ignorant. It's a good thing that his profession requires him to act like a buffoon, because that combination of flaws guarantees that he's very, very good at it.

Defying Evolution


Has any one came across this DVD, well DVD series, yet?


I was going through a superstore, which I will not name or admit to, and in the DVD section I saw this. At least it is in the Easter section (like the Valentines, Christmas, and Halloween ones).


It is hard to read the title. And I can't help, but feel the producers of it want it that way.




Incredible Creatures That Defy Evolution I (And there are 2 more. Oh, joy.)


The Incredible Creatures That Defy Evolution Series enters the fascinating world of animals to reveal sophisticated and complex designs that shake the traditional foundations of evolutionary theory.


Huh?


Sounds like bad science...sorry, pseudoscience.

Now, let us not get this wrong. Evolution, like all theories need and are shook now and then.

That is the the way of science. Reality doesn't change, but our understanding does. And evolution is not immune. Though people like Scott Adams disagree.


So who has put this shocking unknown evidence forward?

This series features Dr. Jobe Martin, who for the past 20 years, has been exploring evolution vs. creation. His findings have been fascinating students around the world as he lectures on these remarkable animal designs that cannot be explained by traditional evolution.

Dr. Martin himself was a traditional evolutionist, but his medical and scientific training would go through an evolutionÉrather a revolution when he began to study animals that challenged the scientific assumptions of his education. This was the beginning of the evolution of a creationist.


SIGH.

An evolutionist?

From the creationist, Answers in Genesis site.

University of Pittsburgh Dental School, 1966

Dallas Theological Seminary, Th.M., 1986



Dental School? Not that you can't or shouldn't come across evolution, but how much did he look at it before...say, a intense moment of emotional turmoil which lead him to leap into the seminary?

Okay, so what have the 20 years of research offered up?

Are there really creatures that produce fire to defend themselves?

How does a giraffe get a drink without causing lethal blood pressure to his brain?

How can Geckos walk upside down, even on glass and not fall?

How can birds navigate over thousands of miles of ocean and never get lost?

How do fireflies and glowworms create light that generates no heat?

How do great whales dive to the bottom of the ocean without the pressure causing them to implode?

What creature was the inspiration for the helicopter?

How can some creatures be cut in half and still regenerate themselves? Some can even grow a new head!

What kind of bird can kill a lion with a single kick?

How can some dogs know that a storm is coming before it appears, or can sense when their masters are about to experience a seizure?

Which creature perlexes scientists because of its amazing ability to heal itself, even when it sustains horrendous injuries?

How do Emperor Penguins go two and a half months without eating or drinking?



So the result, of 20 years of work? Riddles. Questions.

But questions are good. But these questions have been answered and explained in the confines of evolutionary theory, and have been known for years. Not that stops creationist from drudging them up and claiming they are unresolved questions.

If you would like to look at a variety of Creationist claims and the actual science, try the claims section of TalkOrigins.

Primaries? Make that primary.

California is the first among, possibly 14 or more states to begin the move their primary to an earlier slot.

This shift may result with California, New Jersey, Texas, Florida, and the other large pop states finishing up their season at the start of next year. And as a result, decide the party nominees before the end of March. Leaving many months to the conventions.

This also means that the candidates who start BIG and/or start with more money, are the ones who have the only real chance to win out.

...and no doubt the campaigns will start all the earlier.


Should we be happy with this?

He's a Maverick 'cause he don't use no condoms!

Here is an interesting back and forth with Sen John McCain.
Q: “What about grants for sex education in the United States? Should they include instructions about using contraceptives? Or should it be Bush’s policy, which is just abstinence?”

Mr. McCain: (Long pause) “Ahhh. I think I support the president’s policy.”

Q: “So no contraception, no counseling on contraception. Just abstinence. Do you think contraceptives help stop the spread of HIV?”

Mr. McCain: (Long pause) “You’ve stumped me.”

Q: “I mean, I think you’d probably agree it probably does help stop it?”

Mr. McCain: (Laughs) “Are we on the Straight Talk express? I’m not informed enough on it. Let me find out. You know, I’m sure I’ve taken a position on it on the past. I have to find out what my position was. Brian, would you find out what my position is on contraception – I’m sure I’m opposed to government spending on it, I’m sure I support the president’s
policies on it.”

Q: “But you would agree that condoms do stop the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. Would you say: ‘No, we’re not going to distribute them,’ knowing that?”

Mr. McCain: (Twelve-second pause) “Get me Coburn’s thing, ask Weaver to get me Coburn’s paper that he just gave me in the last couple of days. I’ve never gotten into these issues before.”


I support the president...is that how he approaches health care? What did Bush tell me?

This is...The Maverick! Mr. Straight Talk Express! Maybe Chris Matthews could think about that before he next comes on his show.

He has to find a position paper to know if contraceptives are valuable and important in protecting sex partners?

Didn't he join the military? I am pretty sure they teach just this, and have been warning and prepping soldiers, sailors, and airmen since before WWII.

Emanuel is already On Notice...what's next?


My Left Wing has an interesting look at Rep. Rahm Emanuel of Illinois. He has been telling the junior members of Congress...well he has been telling them a lot of things. Primarily he focuses on everything they should not do.

Yes, he is the older brother who ruins your first months of high school or college, freaking you out about all the things that will go wrong.

And when you don't do as he says, he spazzes.

One of Emanuel's chief orders...suggestions? Do not...ever...for your life's sake...

...go on The Colbert Report.

Yeah.

Not avoid riding in the elevator with Thune, he's gassy. Or, never eat the blue jello. No, it is don't go on one of the most popular interview shows that focuses a lot on politics and has a host that likes democrats.

The man is brilliant.

Honestly--How bizarro does your world have to be, and what kind of fantasy bubble must you be living in, for your advice as a leading Democrat to the Democratic faithful is go on Fox, but stay off of Colbert? What kind of total short-sighted idiocy is that

Emanuel was, I believe, already On Notice with Colbert. Will he now move over to Dead To Me? Colbert can play rough. And he has a lot of lists.

Congress and Iran - Mk II


As you may know, if you have been following the House in the past week, a plan to tie military funding to the legislature having a say on war with Iran was scraped.
This ticked plenty of people off.
But Pelosi seems to want to allay concerns that they are caving in the House to the White House.
On March 13, the same day House Appropriations Chairman David R. Obey, D-Wis., said he had removed the Iran provision from the draft war spending measure, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., quietly promised Appropriations Committee Democrats that she would soon bring the measure up as a stand-alone bill, said James P. Moran, D-Va., who attended the meeting in Pelosi’s suite.
So this is not getting brushed under the rug. Good. Maybe it is for the best, to not let the story be about cutting off support for the troops. Alone, it is a simple argument. The president needs to talk with the Congress before going to war. Especially, yet another, war.

Interesting look at Cheney at AIPAC


There are many views of the Jewish lobby in the US.

TO some they are a secret government. To some a good friend to the US. To some meddlesome and narrow minded.

Many views, some more paranoid than others.


But it is here, and through the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, we have a view of this lobby bloc.

AIPAC has had it's annual conference in Washington. Many luminaries appeared and talked.

Informed Comment looks at some of the reactions to one speaker in particular, Dick Cheney, the US's Veep. From one participant:
I was one of the reporters noting the relatively cool reception for Cheney's remarks, an impression I confirmed later in extensive conversations at the conference. (Similar accounts appeared in Ha'aretz, the Forward and the Jerusalem Post.) There were whole chunks of the Iraq portion of Cheney's Iraq speech that were met with silence - even the clear applause cues. And those portions that were applauded never got even half the hall; I saw most of the hall seated, arms crossed at those times. The boos for Pelosi, by the way, came AFTER she got cheered for her call for a withdrawal. I.e. applause, cheers and then a few scattered boos. The cheers for Pelosi's Iraq withdrawal call, it must be said, were basically polite - not at all overwhelming; but the boos were even weaker. . .

The Israeli/Jewish lobby is not all that gung ho over Iraq. I wonder how keyed up they are about Iran? I mean, the loud mouth in charge is saying nasty stuff, but I wonder if they have worries about how much worse an expanding war near them will make things.

Maybe they could go and talk to the Israeli government, and lobby them a bit.


Juan Cole has more about the American Jewish community and how strongly it is really backing Israel's gambits.
For another examination of differences within the Jewish community over issues like military aggression toward Iran, see this piece in the American Conservative. The article looks at the emerging liberal Jewish blogosphere that is unafraid to acknowledge and challenge the influence of the Israel lobby.37% of American Jews don't feel a strong connection to Israel, and many are uncomfortable with Israeli policies such as Alison Weir reveals on Israeli strip-searches of Palestinian women and children.

Friday, March 16, 2007

Delay questions Gingrich's morals...



Oh, snap!


How is that for a slam. Gingrich has recently had a heart to heart with James "Casting the First Stone" Dobson, over his infidelity and denials. It was all seen as a step towards running for president.


Well, it seems Tom "The Hammer" Delay is about to release his memoirs.


They are not all that kind to the former speaker.



Newt Gingrich's attempted phoenix-like rise from his own political ashes to a presidential candidacy will run next week into a harsh assessment by his former House Republican colleague Tom DeLay. The former majority leader's forthcoming memoir assails Gingrich as an "ineffective" House speaker with a flawed moral compass.

DeLay also declares that "our leadership was in no moral shape to press" for the impeachment of President Bill Clinton. Writing well before Gingrich's admission for the first time last week, DeLay asserts: "It is now public knowledge that Newt Gingrich was having an affair with a staffer during the entire impeachment crisis. Clearly, men with such secrets are not likely to sound a high moral tone at a moment of national crisis."

Ayaan Hirsi Ali


Ayyan Hirsi Ali was on The Colbert Report last night. It was an interesting chat, and may be interesting to watch.
Here is an older chat, from Real Time with Bill Mahr.
I have been interested to see some of the negative reactions to her and her thoughts.
Some call her naive. Some are upset she doesn't focus any ire on Christianity, or all religion.
And many dislike her connection to AEI, the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank. And those ties go back to her time in Holland and connections to conservative politicians there.
They are thoughts and concerns worth contemplating.
But I am not ready to just dismiss her. She grew up in Muslim family, she fled it. She moved to Holland, found similar intolerance in the community. She spoke out, based on what she heard and experienced. This lead to her friend being murdered, and she was under constant threat of death. All for offering criticism.
So her fixation on the religion of her life experience and who has many members that long to throttle her to death...not too surprising.

A broader reproach of religion would be nice. And not tying oneself to AEI or similar very conservative think tanks would be quite nice. And I, as a result, look at her words with some credulity.
Just as I do when I agree with Christopher Hitchens. He is hard on all people who wrap themselves in the holy. But he also passionately backs the Iraq War. So I try hard to look at any reasoning he applies.
She has many legit grievances with her childhood religion. Mutilation, forced marriage, murder. If she wants to focus on Islam, that is her prerogative. It is up to others, to us, to take it forward and ask equally hard questions of our own faiths and the faiths around us.
She is a great example to women and all people. It is not wrong to question authority or sacred cows. Even if they throw stones or fire bullets.

AnglicanArchbishops are clearer on gays than the Democratic candidates for president.




People have been more than a little annoyed with the eagerness of the likes of Clinton, Obama, and Edwards to not jump to the defense of the gay community.


It seems the former Anglican Archbishop of Cape Town, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate,Desmond Tutu, has a stronger opinion.


His take:

Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Desmond Tutu, the former Anglican Archbishop of Cape Town, has warned African churches against paying too much attention to the issue of homosexuality while ignoring real problems facing the continent."

I am deeply, deeply distressed that in the face of the most horrendous problems -- we've got poverty, we've got conflict and war, we've got HIV/AIDS -- and what do we concentrate on? We concentrate on what you are doing in bed," Tutu told journalists in Nairobi during the World Social Forum.

***

Tutu likened discrimination against homosexuals to that faced by black people under South Africa's racist apartheid policies.

"To penalise someone because of their sexual orientation is like what used to happen to us; to be penalised for something which we could do nothing [about] -- our ethnicity, our race," said Tutu. "I would find it quite unacceptable to condemn, persecute a minority that has already been persecuted."


This is especially interesting in light of attitudes towards gays coming from many Southern Baptist. I have seen a number of Baptist who have disdain for homosexuals. And they get very angry to hear ANY comparison to the struggles of blacks in the US. It is an unfortunate intolerance of a group who are being put upon, but that many just don't like. Now many Baptists are supportive of the gay community, but fora many vocal opponents their is a sense that gays are a minority that deserves it.

Tutu disagrees.

Thursday, March 15, 2007

Zbigniew is big news...to policy wonks


Zbigniew Brzezinski was on The Daily Show last night.

He was talking about current international events, and his new book, Second Chance: Three Presidents and the Crisis of American Superpower.

It was interesting to listen to him. He has very pointed words for our current president. As well, for the last two presidents.

Clinton, had nice ideas and good intentions.

Bush I, was promising and did a number of things, but did not push ahead with diplomacy at the key moment, post-Gulf War. So things atrophied.

And his kid stomped the withered remains of detente into the dust.

It is a good interview, check the video.

As he points out, if we let things worsen and continue, we will find ourselves in a war stretching from Iraq to Pakistan...then you got India sitting there. And they have those darn nuclear weapons. It is all the more troubling with news that the US is considering the idea of supporting a coup. So we would remove by coup another coup. That would end well...

We need clearer heads to start prevailing.

I am tempted to pickup his book, I'll have to see if an audio version is coming out.