PZ Myers point to something I have been long wanted to see determined one way or another.
Bjorn Lomborg has long played himself off as a great skeptic, standing against the Global Warming dogma. He has tried to sound reasonable, pointing to the pointlessness of laws and regs that claim to fight the polluting influence of the modern world.
But his work is now in question. As the piece aboce notes. In going through the footnotes of Lomborg, it seems the referencing doesn't bare out his claims. Interesting. I hope we hear more.